I read this article this morning on Drudge, and I am somewhat outraged by it.

How can he legitimately make the claim that Kerry's position on abortion in 1972, a year before Roe v. Wade came down, is even remotely representative of his position now? The fact that a young catholic democrat opposed addressing abortion in favor of other issues, which remain highly important even today, when abortion was still opposed by a majority of people and addressed by even fewer is simply unimportant today. This is one issue, of many I am sure, that a person has the right to change their position on as times and society change. I think it is absurd that Drudge is trying to make an issue out of the fact that in 1972 Kerry may not have wanted to address abortion as a national issue.

I am still checking and you're absolutely right. Reading the Drudge report is like Star. There may be a kernal of truth somewhere in there but in the end it just rots your brain.